Chapter 4: "The Future of Journalism" - A cautionary tale

We've been having an interesting discussion about the Future of Journalism in class recently and these conversations have got me thinking about the direction things are headed. A friend and classmate Posted Her Thoughts via an editorial in the Winnipeg Free Press, we spoke at length in Journalism class, and even my instructors, Kenton Larsen and Duncan McMonagle have weighed in.

My turn!

I have been thinking about An Article I read about a month ago that introduced me to the term "Hit Board", which I found out, is a public record of how many pageviews or "hits" every single article has, on the the videogame-journalism site Kotaku, The article focuses on Kotaku's new EIC Stephen Totilo (@stephentotilo), his philosophy on journalism in gaming and how his website measures success.

Apparently, with this site and all subdivisions of Gawker, Kotaku's "parent" blog, the content producers use the "Hit Board" as a tool to help tailor their future content to what is most popular and what got the most pageviews because essentially, these articles got the most advertising views.

Tailoring content towards the masses seems like a dangerous concept to me, because of what the general population seems to value in today's instant-gratification, change-fearing, reality-TV/celebrity obsessed culture that we've created. 

This creates an atmosphere where contributors to the website would steer away from writing a potentially interesting, engaging story about something no one has heard of yet, and instead choose to write a puff piece about something already popular just because it's guaranteed to drive high traffic.

Kotaku is a good example of this degradation in quality of content already. Articles and editorials about videogames and systems released months (and even years) ago are being written and posted on a daily basis, because the writers know that established fans will read a familiar article about something they like, as opposed to an article about something foreign to them.

This is a dangerous system for journalism to operate under but it seems like one of the only business models that is proven thus far, at least, in the realm of online media. 

Popular = Hits, Hits = Ads, Ads = Money, Money = Success!

One might argue that journalism should never be concerned with what's in or what sells, but in order to operate an actual media outlet that can pay its employees and continue to do business... It will need to bring in revenue somehow. 

For content producing sites, is there another business model that can or will emerge? Will subscriptions or paywalls emerge as profitable options? Are people even willing to pay for premium content?  Or will our content producing journalistic media be forced down a dangerous path of writing to appease the masses? 

Only thing I can say for certain is... It's a damn interesting time to be a Creative Communications student. 

                                                                                        -NxB

Playing: Guild Wars 2 by ArenaNet 

Watching:  The Office

Listening to: Childish Gambino - Camp

Chapter 3: "Does Obama's Product Placement Belong Inside Our Media?" - An honest question

In 2008, when President Obama was campaigning for President, he did something that no politician had ever attempted before him; he placed a virtual advertisement in a video game.

Two actual in-game advertisements from 2008, photo via blog.epromos.com/

Electronic Arts Inc. was the first to allow such practice to occur, in their NHL, NBA, NFL, and Need for Speed franchises. Virtual Billboards were purchased with Obama's face plastered all over them, and this practice is to continue in the 2012 election.

Now this makes me wonder, why are blatant political shills allowed to exist in this genre of entertainment and not others? 

What if, at the end of the The Dark Knight Rises, Obama walked out, shook Bruce Wayne's hand, and said "I hope I can count on your vote in November. Obama/Batman 2012!"

I mean, aside from being awesome, and Fox News literally imploding on itself... What else would happen? Would there even be an uproar?

How far away are we until we see Political Product Placement in our mainstream media? It's already happening in video games but no one is batting an eye. Artists are already whoring themselves out for both American political parties and they are applauded for it.

Can you imagine the metaphorical shit-storm (and Twitt-storm) if Walt from Breaking Bad or Jax from Sons of Anarchy walked past a Romney billboard in the season premieres of their respective shows? Would the potential outrage be the same if it was an Obama billboard? Do political ads even belong in the same vein as the commercially driven product placement we see every single day? 

Obama/Tellar 2012!

This is a slippery slope and I, for one, hope that political advertising doesn't infiltrate/penetrate our entertainment any further. Artistic integrity is hemorrhaging to death and is almost non-existent in today's culture, but is nothing sacred anymore?

                                                                                        -NxB

Playing: Borderlands 2 by Gearbox & Guild Wars 2 by ArenaNet 

Reading:  Whatever I'm assigned to read in school.

Watching:  The Daily Show with Jon Stewart